September, 27, 2023
Time
Justice Athar Minullah has issued detailed reasons

Justice Athar Minullah has issued detailed reasons

9 The result was the same in the consultation room, I was separated from the case and there was no good reason to separate me. I agree with the conclusion reached by Justice Mansoor and Justice Jamal

The country is on the brink of a political and constitutional crisis, the Supreme Court has not learned from the past, all those responsible are not a step back, and the action has made the court two-four from political conflicts. (Justice Athar)

The Supreme Court dismissed the prime ministers by allowing the usurper to amend the constitution, should PTI’s forum shopping not have been taken notice of? Reasons for the order issued.

ISLAMABAD (Mian Aqeel Afzal) Supreme Court Justice Athar Minullah has issued detailed reasons for his order in the self-notice case related to elections in Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Rejected, the act of sua sponte has exposed the court to unnecessary political controversy. The dissenting note consists of 25 pages. In his detailed dissenting note issued on Friday, Justice Athar Manullah said that I have read the judgment of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Jamal Khan Mandukhel. I agree with the decision of Justice Yahya Khan Afridi dismissing the petitions and also with the conclusion reached by Justice Mansoor Ali Shah and Justice Jamal Khan Mandukhel regarding the order that the decision of the Supreme Court was rejected by a majority of four and three groups ordered the president and the governor to schedule the elections. Justice Athar Manullah says that this was the result of the consultation held in the room on February 27. He further says that I did not separate myself from the reach and there was no reason to separate me. Justice Athar Manullah said that the lesson is that all institutions including the Supreme Court should fulfill their constitutional obligations. The Supreme Court has not learned anything from the past. With the country on the brink of a political and constitutional crisis, it is time for all those responsible to take a step back and do some introspection. It has been noted that due to historical reasons for the PIA elections of Punjab, self-notice is rejected, there are three main reasons for the rejection of applications and self-notice. Adherence to the basic principles of application of Article 184 III was required on the bench, the court should be careful about the interests of political parties for its impartiality, the court should also look at the conduct and good faith of the political petitioner, the petition The proceedings do not require that the hearing authority of 184/3 be exercised. Justice Athar Manullah said that taking notice by oneself would mean promoting undemocratic values ​​and strategies. Past decisions cannot be erased, but at least good efforts can be made by restoring public trust. Arising out of a controversy that was essentially political in nature, Justice Yahya Afridi rightly said that the court should exercise caution in the use of ex officio notices, the Supreme Court being dragged into political controversy for the third time in a row.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *