Supreme Court Delays Pager Packets and Pager Act Hearing

Infostani Reporter-The Supreme Court adjourned the hearing of the petitions against the Pager Packets and Pager Act till October 3 and ordered all the parties to submit their written responses by September 25, Chief Justice Qazi Faizaj started the implementation of the Payne Act. He remarked that he tried to finish the case but could not, he would also form it with the consultation of the two most senior judges.

Landmark Supreme Court Case Broadcast Live on TV

Asked Justice Ijaz-ul-Ahsan if he had no objection to which both Jeju said they had no objection. The Chief Justice said that a written order would be issued for today’s hearing. The hearing of the most important case in the Supreme Court was broadcast live on TV for the first time in the country’s history. The 15-member full court heard the case throughout the day. Before the hearing of the case, a full court meeting was held under the chairmanship of Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa in which it was approved to show the hearing live on TV.

Later, when the hearing started, Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Aini remarked that we had allowed the hearing to be continued and a committee had been formed so that the hearing would not disrupted. Petitioner’s lawyer Khawaja Tariq Rahim said that it is a matter of honor for me to appear before the full court. An amendment to the Constitution is needed to grant the right of appeal, but the Tax and Procedure Act is unconstitutional. Justice Ijaz-ul-Hassan inquired how the right of appeal can be given without constitutional amendment, the right of appeal is given in Article 185, can the right of appeal be given through common law while there is no appeal in the constitution?

Afridi said that the Rules of 1980 for regulating the Supreme Court do not meet the criteria of Article 191. Justice Muneeb Akhtar remarked that Parliament can return its powers to the Chief Justice of Pakistan tomorrow.

Is not handing over the administrative powers of the Supreme Court to the Parliament contrary to the concept of separation of powers? How can the right of appeal be given from the common law without amending the Constitution? How can Ahar Lute decide whether the committee is three-member or five-member? Justice Ayesha Malik said that if a three-member committee makes a decision, how will the affected party have the right to appeal against this decision?

Justice Athar Manullah said that regulating the powers of the Chief Justice is a violation of fundamental rights An appeal can be made against the decision of the membership committee by amending the router. Common people should also have the right to file an appeal against martial law, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood asked what would happen to the decisions given under Article 184 III if the law is declared valid, which the attorney The general said that this principle cannot be applied from the past, the decisions that have been made have now become past and closed or transactions.

Advocate Imtiaz Siddiqui said 2-3 questions were asked, two days should be given to answer them. Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa told the lawyers on the questions of fellow children that if there are questions from all sides, you will find it difficult to answer, we did not come here to argue with each other, you should not answer the question immediately. Give, note down the questions, and then answer them, and give arguments first.

The Supreme Court has the power to regulate its powers, in my view, the 1980 Rules are of no importance. In our society, every time a dictator imposes martial law and gets 98.6% of the vote, we cannot hold a referendum to check the law. Challenge the law in the High Court, you have come for our mine, we are not sitting here to support you. I mentioned the full court meeting on administrative sta.