The Government had also filed a full court application

According to Justice Ejaz-ul-Ahsan, Parliament has given the answer to the Full Court in its own law. According to the bill, a five-member bench will hear the case of interpretation of the constitution. The Supreme Court says it should be a five-member bench, while the Attorney General says it should be a full court. The court normally hears petitions against laws. Justice Mazahir Naqvi inquired whether 60 will be heard in Lahore High Court and 40 in Sindh High Court. Justice Ayesha Malik asked whether all eight judges would decide that a full court be formed.

In conclusion, the case involves legislative powers and the formation of a court to hear petitions against the Petitions and Privy Council Act. The court ordered the record of proceedings of the Parliamentary and Standing Committee be provided to the Attorney General, and the government had also filed a full court application. The Supreme Court debated whether a five-member bench or a full court should hear the case of interpretation of the Constitution. The court also discussed the admissibility of the request to constitute a full court and the reservations at the request of the murder court.